NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 61 NSWLR 521
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Transgrid v. Siemens Ltd. & Anor. [2004] NSWCA 395 HEARING DATE(S) : 14 Septermber 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 3 November 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Giles JA at 2; Hodgson JA at 3 DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS : BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION - Progress payments - Building & Construction Industry Security of Payment Act - Progress claim - Adjudicator's determination - Grounds for judicial intervention - Calculation of progress payment - Meaning of "amount calculated in accordance with the terms of the contract" where contract provides for certification by superintendent - Discretion. LEGISLATION CITED : Building & Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 Abacus Funds Management v. Davenport [2003] NSWSC 1027 Anisminic Ltd. v. Foreign Compensation Commission [1969] 2 AC 147 Banks v. Transport Regulation Board (Vic) (1968) 119 CLR 222 Brodyn Pty. Limited v. Davenport [2003] NSWSC 1019 Brodyn Pty. Limited v. Davenport [2004] NSWCA 394 Calvin v. Carr [1080] AC 574 Craig v. South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163 Durayappah v. Fernando [1967] 2 AC 337 CASES CITED : Emag Constructions Pty. Limited v. Highrise Concrete Contractors (Aust) Pty. Limited [2003] NSWSC 903 Holdmark Developers Pty. Limited v. G.J. Formwork Pty. Limited [2004] NSWSC 905 Leighton Contractors Pty. Ltd. v. Campbelltown Catholic Club [2003] NSWSC 1103 Minister for Immigration v. Bhardwaj (2002) 209 CLR 597 Multiplex Constructions Pty. Limited v. Luikens [2003] NSWSC 1140 Musico v. Davenport [2003] NSWSC 977 Project Blue Sky Inc. v. Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 R v. Hickman; Ex Parte Fox and Clinton (1945) 70 CLR 598 Ridge v. Baldwin [1964] AC 40 Transgrid v. Walter Construction Group [2004] NSWSC 21 Transgrid (A Statutory State Owned Corporation) - appellant PARTIES : Siemens Limited - 1st appellant Timothy Sullivan - 2nd appellant FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40207/04 COUNSEL : Mr. F. Corsaro SC for appellant Mr. B. Walker SC with Mr. M. Christie for 1st respondent Doyles, Sydney for appellant SOLICITORS : Baker & McKenzie, Sydney for 1st appellant Colin Biggers & Paisley, Sydney for 2nd respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate