NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Riscuta and Niga [2003] NSWCCA 6 HEARING DATE(S) : 22 November 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 6 February 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Heydon JA at 1; Hulme J at 128; Carruthers AJ at 163 DECISION : See paragraph 127
CATCHWORDS : Criminal law - appeal against conviction - leave to appeal against sentence - supply of prohibited drug - heroin - admissibility of voice identification evidence - intercepted telephone conversations - relevance - s 55 (1) Evidence Act 1995 - probative value - whether trial judge's direction on voice identification evidence was adequate - overconfidence in witness - whether witness's prior familiarity with voice identified amounted to unfair prejudice to accused - Evidence Act 1995 s 137 - identification evidence - Evidence Act 1995 s 116 - whether trial judge's summing up was satisfactory - perverse verdict - search warrant - execution of search warrant by night - Jones v Dunkel - failure of accused to call particular witness - failure of Crown to call particular witness - operation of proviso to s 6(1) of Criminal Appeal Act 1912 - where no substantial miscarriage of justice has actually occurred - whether appellant lost a chance, which was fairly open, of being acquitted or lost a real chance of acquittal - Sentencing - consideration of circumstances. Criminal Appeal Act 1912 LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 Search Warrants Act 1985 Azzopardi v R (2001) 205 CLR 50 Bone v Commissioner of Stamp Duties [1972] 2 NSWLR 651 Bulejcik v R (1996) 185 CLR 375 Business World Computers Pty Ltd v Australian Telecommunications Commission (1988) 82 ALR 499 Domican v R (1992) 173 CLR 555 DPP v Hamman (unreported, CCA, 1 December 1998) Driscoll v R (1977) 137 CLR 517 Dyers v R (2002) 192 ALR 181 Festa v R (2001) 185 ALR 394 Glennon v R (1994) 119 ALR 706 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 MacKenzie v R (1996) 190 CLR 348 RPS v R (2000) 199 CLR 620 R v Adler (2001) 52 NSWLR 451 CASES CITED : R v Blakeman [1999] NSWCCA 415 R v Buckland [1977] 2 NSWLR 452 R v Dodd (1991) 57 A Crim R 349 R v Dungay (2001) 126 A Crim R 216 R v Fahda [1999] NSWCCA 267 R v Marshall (2000) 113 A Crim R 190 R v Newland (1997) 98 A Crim R 455 R v Peel (1971) 1 NSWLR 247 R v Phelan (1993) 66 A Crim R 447 R v Smith [1984] 1 NSWLR 462 R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534 R v Taufua [1999] NSWCCA 205 R v Todd (1982) 2 NSWLR 517 Veen v R (No 2) (1987-1988) 164 CLR 465 Velevski v R (2002) 187 ALR 233 R v Whyte [2002] NSWCC 343 PARTIES : Regina v Doru Riscuta Regina v Mariana Niga FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60802/01; 60283/02 Mr K G Horler AM QC (Riscuta) COUNSEL : Mr S J Odgers SC/Mr C B Simpson (Niga) Mr G I O Rowling (Respondent) John Bettens & Co (Riscuta) SOLICITORS : Baird & Associates (Niga) S E O'Connor (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate