NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v RUTTER [2003] NSWCCA 306 HEARING DATE(S) : 01/10/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 26 October 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Tobias JA at 1; Howie J at 2; Shaw J at 32 DECISION : Leave to appeal granted; Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : Criminal Law - sentencing - parity - relevant principles LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900 s 113(2) Anderson (1981) 2 A Crim R 379; Engert (1995) 84 A Crim R 67; Gibson (1991) 56 A Crim R 1; Lovelock v The Queen (1978) 19 ALR 327; Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606; Postiglione v The Queen (1996) 189 CLR 295; R v Cox (1996) 66 SASR 152; R v Duggett (Unreported, NSWCCA, 24 March 1997); CASES CITED : R v Fahda [1999] NSWCCA 267; R v Ilbay [2000] NSWCCA 251; R v Koomson [2001] NSWCCA 176 R v Litteri (Unreported, NSWCCA, 18/3/1992); R v Mooney (Unreported, CCA (Vic), 21 June 1978); R v Osenkowski (1982) 30 SASR 212; R v Schultz [2002] NSWCCA 462; R v Wahabzadah [2001] NSWCCA 253; Scognamilglo (1991) 56 A Crim R 81; Wright (1997) 93 A Crim R 48; Regina PARTIES : Daniel Gordon RUTTER - Applicant
FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60163/03 COUNSEL : M Conditsis - Applicant D Howard - Crown SOLICITORS : Conditsis and Associates - Applicant S O'Connor - Crown
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 01/31/0392; 01/11/1277 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT McGuire DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate