NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v LTP [2004] NSWCCA 109 HEARING DATE(S) : 25 March 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 1 July 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Dunford J at 1; Simpson J at 113; Howie J at 118 DECISION : Appeal allowed on count 4 - verdict of acquittal entered - appeal against conviction on count 5 dismissed - sentence varied.
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - sexual assault - complainant daughter of appellant - delay in complaint - necessity for Kilby direction - Longman direction - sufficiency of - multiple counts - different verdicts - whether inconsistent - summing up - directions on onus of proof - whether misleading or confusing - proviso - CRIMINAL LAW - sexual assault - date of offence - legislative changes - offence not in existence at date of offence - fellatio not carnal knowledge - CRIMINAL LAW - sentencing - sexual assault - complainant daughter of appellant - EVIDENCE - limiting cross-examination of complainant - whether any miscarriage of justice Crimes Act 1900 ss 66, 405 Crimes (Child Assault) Amendment Act, no 149 of 1985 LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Appeal Act 1912 ss 6, 7 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 ss 16, 294 Evidence Act 1995 s 41 Crampton v The Queen (2000) 75 ALJR 133 Crampton v The Queen [2000] HCA 60, 206 CLR 161 Crofts v The Queen (1996) 186 CLR 427 Doggett v The Queen [2001] HCA 46, 208 CLR 343 Dyers v The Queen [2002] HCA 45, 210 CLR 285 Festa v The Queen [2001] HCA 72, 208 CLR 593 Green v The Queen (1971) 126 CLR 28 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Jones v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 439 Kilby v The Queen (1973) 129 CLR 460 Longman v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 79 Peacock v The King (1911) 13 CLR 619 R v Bikic [2002] NSWCCA 227 R v BWT [2002] NSWCCA 60, 54 NSWLR 241 CASES CITED : R v Davies (1985) 3 NSWLR 276 R v Dennis (CCA - 14 December 1992) R v DJK (1997) 96 A Crim R 443 R v Durocher-Yvon [2003] NSWCCA 299 R v Ho [2002] NSWCCA 147, 130 A Crim R 545 R v Johnston (1998) 45 NSWLR 362 R v JTS (CCA - 18 September 1998) R v Li [2003] NSWCCA 386 R v Markuleski [2001] NSWCCA 290, 52 NSWLR 82 R v PLV [2001] NSWCCA 282, 51 NSWLR 736 R v Reeves (1992) 29 NSWLR 109 R v Sleiman [2003] NSWCCA 231 R v Stringer (2000) 116 A Crim R 198 R v Williams (1999) 104 A Crim R 260 Shepherd v The Queen (1991) 170 CLR 573 Spies v The Queen [2000] HCA 43, 201 CLR 603 PARTIES : Regina v LTP FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60477/03 COUNSEL : D C Frearson - Crown P Segal - Appellant SOLICITORS : S E O'Connor - Crown Quirk Davidson & Easdown - Appellant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate