NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Frazer [2004] NSWCCA 111 HEARING DATE(S) : Thursday, 15 April 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 15 April 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Sully J at 1; Dowd J at 2; Smart AJ at 29 DECISION : Leave to appeal granted; Appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS : Appeal against sentence - supply prohibited drug - co-offender - parity principle LEGISLATION CITED : Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Lowe v R (1984) 154 CLR 606 CASES CITED : Postiglione v R (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Tiddy (1969) SASR 575 PARTIES : Crown Scott James Frazer FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60007/04 COUNSEL : Mr T Healey (Applicant) Mr B Knox SC (Respondent) SOLICITORS : Mr E Fritchley (Applicant) Mr S Kavanagh (Respondent)
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 00/31/0422 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Nicholson DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
- 6 - IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60007/04
SULLY J DOWD J SMART AJ
Thursday, 15 April 2004 REGINA v SCOTT JAMES FRAZER Judgment 1 SULLY J: I agree with Dowd J. 2 DOWD J: The applicant, Scott James Frazer, has sought leave to appeal against a sentence imposed by Nicholson DCJ consequent upon the applicant's conviction on a count of Supply A Prohibited Drug, namely, amphetamine, on an ongoing basis between 24 October 1999 and 23 November 1999, contrary to s25A of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985, after a trial by jury. The offence carries a maximum penalty of 20 years imprisonment and/or 3,500 penalty units.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate