NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Wentworth v Rogers [2004] NSWSC 1176 HEARING DATE(S) : 1/9/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 10 December 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Bell J at 1 DECISION : 1. Discharge order 1 made by Acting Deputy Registrar Whitehead on 17 September 2003 that; The interest of Gordon Rogers comprising the property "Te Mata" at Upper Moore Creek Road, Tamworth in the State of New South Wales, being folio identifier 71/615640 stand charged with an order pursuant to s 27 of the Judgment Creditors' Remedies Act 1901; 2. The respondent, Katherine Wentworth, is to pay the applicant, Toni Rogers', costs of the motion.
Conveyancing Act 1919 LEGISLATION CITED : Judgment Creditors' Remedies Act 1901 Real Property Act 1900 Supreme Court Rules 1970 Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd v Greig [1980] 1 NSWLR 112 Coleman v De Lissa (1885) 6 LR(NSW) Eq 104 DM and BP Wiskich Pty Ltd v Saadi (unreported) NSWSC 16 February 1996 CASES CITED : In the Marriage of Pauley (1994) 17 Fam LR 448 Midland Bank plc v Pike [1988] 2 All ER 434 Quint v Robertson (1985) 3 NSWLR 398 Worrell v Issitch [2000] QSC 146 PARTIES : Katherine Wentworth (Plaintiff) Gordon John Rogers (Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 19228/82 COUNSEL : In Person (Plaintiff) R Lovas (Toni Rogers) SOLICITORS : In person Dorrough Smart (Toni Rogers)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
BELL J
Friday, 10 December 2004
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate