NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : John Holland Pty Limited v Cardno MBK (NSW) Pty Limited & Ors [2004] NSWSC 258 HEARING DATE(S) : 31/03/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 20 April 2004
JURISDICTION: Equity Division Technology and Construction List JUDGMENT OF : Einstein J DECISION : Jurisdictional error and denial of natural justice shown to have occurred.
CATCHWORDS : Challenge to determination of adjudicator under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 - Statutory scheme dictates that the adjudication response be relevantly tied to the payment schedule [such that the adjudication response cannot include any reasons for withholding payment unless those reasons have already been included in the payment schedule - Section 20 (2B)] - Whether adjudication application should also be relevantly tied to the payment claim [such that the adjudication application cannot include reasons supporting the payment claim unless those reasons had been included in the payment claim] - Scheme of legislation - Adjudicator's powers - Adjudicator does not have the power to consider materials supplied by a claimant in its adjudication application which go outside [ie fall outside the ambit or scope of] the materials which were provided in the payment claim LEGISLATION CITED : Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 Supreme Court Act Abacus v Davenport & Ors [2003] NSWSC 1027 Anisminic Limited v Foreign Compensation Commission [1969] 2 AC 147 Brambles Australia Ltd v Davenport [2004] NSWSC 120 Brodyn Pty Limited t/as Time Cost and Quality (ACN 001 998 830) v Philip Davenport & Ors [2003] NSWSC 1019 Craig v The State of South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163 CASES CITED : Hill v King (1993) 31 NSWLR 654 Multiplex Constructions Pty Limited v Luikens & Ors [2003] NSWSC 1140 Musico & Ors v Davenport & Ors [2003] NSWSC 977 Newcastle City Council v GIO General Ltd [1997] 191 CLR 85 Quasar Constructions v Demtech Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 116 R v Alley; Ex parte New South Wales Plumbers and Gas Fitters Employees' Union (1981) 153 CLR 376 Transgrid v Siemens Ltd [2004] NSWSC 87 John Holland Pty Limited (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Cardno MBK (NSW) Pty Limited (First Defendant) Graeme Robinson (Second Defendant) The Institute of Arbitrators and Mediators Australia (Third Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 55002/04 Mr M Christie (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : Mr D Miller (First Defendant) No appearance for Second and Third Defendants Clayton Utz (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : David Campbell-Williams Construction Lawyer Bradfield Scott (Sydney Agent) (First Defendant) Philips Fox (submitting appearance)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate