NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Rennes & Anor v Death & Ors [2003] NSWSC 708 revised - 12/08/2003 HEARING DATE(S) : 28/07/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 4 August 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Gzell J DECISION : Gifts of paddocks valid. Order for excision of proviso. Costs to be borne by devisees.
CATCHWORDS : SUCCESSION - Wills, Probate and Administration - Construction and effect of testamentary dispositions - Devises of paddocks within a lot in a deposited plan - Whether void for uncertainty - Proviso that devisee remain the registered proprietor of other land - Gift of that land to the testatrix who gifted it back by her will - Whether proviso should be excised - Whether rectification available at common law or limited to the Wills, Probate and Administration Act 1898, s 29A(1) - Whether the costs of subdivision and transfer of the paddocks should be borne by the devisees LEGISLATION CITED : Wills, Probate and Administration Act 1898 Family Provision Act 1982 Mason v Robinson (1825) 2 Sim & St 295 (57 ER 359) Adams v Jones (1852) 9 Hare 485 (68 ER 602) Re Roberts; Repington v Roberts-Gawen (1881) 19 Ch D 520 Smidmore v Smidmore (1905) 3 CLR 344 CASES CITED : Re Doland's Will Trusts [1970] 1 Ch 267 Rhodes v Rhodes (1882) 7 App Cas 192 Osborne v Smith (1960) 105 CLR 153 Lloyd v Frape (1922) 23 SR(NSW) 11 Re Grosvenor [1916] 2 Ch 375 Re Hewett [1920] 90 LJ Ch 126 Sharon Carol Rennes and Nikki Elizabeth Smith - Plaintiffs PARTIES : Thomas James Death - 1st Defendant Russell William Death - 2nd Defendant FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3776/02 COUNSEL : B K Ralston - Plaintiffs C M Simpson - 1st Defendant SOLICITORS : Garvins Solicitors Golsby Whiteley Solicitors
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate