NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 49 ACSR 443 (2004) 22 ACLC 901
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : In the matter of ACN 003 671 387 and ACN 008 664 257 [2004] NSWSC 368 HEARING DATE(S) : 23 March & 19 April 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 4 May 2004 JURISDICTION: Equity JUDGMENT OF : Austin J DECISION : Leave granted to enter into transactions; order for termination of winding up.
CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS - winding up - liquidator seeks leave to enter into transaction for his personal benefit - source of power to grant leave - whether leave should be granted - whether winding up should be terminated Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 182, 183, 482 LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules, Pt 1 r 8 Supreme Court (Corporations) Rules, r 7.10 Boardman v Phipps [1967] 2 AC 46 Brolrik Pty Ltd v Sambah Holdings Pty Ltd (2001) 40 ACSR 361 Christie v Edwards [1939] 1 DLR 158 Commissioner for the Corporate Affairs v Harvey [1980] VR 669 CASES CITED : Empire (Aust) Nominees Pty Ltd v Vince (2000) 35 ACSR 167 Mercy & Sons Pty Ltd v Wanari Pty Ltd (2000) 35 ACSR 70 Queensland Mines Ltd v Hudson (1978) 18 ALR 1 Re Chevron Furnishers Pty Ltd (1994) 12 ACSR 565 Re GK Pty Ltd (in liq); ex parte Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1983) 1 ACLC 848 Thomas Franklin v Cameron (1935) 36 SR(NSW) 286 4595/01 PARTIES : ACN 003 671 387 Pty Ltd (In liq) (P) 4596/01 ACN 008 664 257 Pty Ltd (In liq) (P) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4595/01, 4596/01 COUNSEL : R J Weber SC (P) SOLICITORS : DMAW Lawyers (Adelaide) by their agents Aitken McLachlan Thorpe (P)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate