NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : K'Mart Australia Ltd v McCann [No 2] [2004] NSWCA 364 HEARING DATE(S) : Determined on the papers JUDGMENT DATE : 11 November 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Handley JA at 1; Ipp JA at 2; Pearlman AJA at 3 DECISION : Application dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : Application for costs on an indemnity basis - offers of compromise - application made pursuant to District Court Rules - Court of Appeal not bound by District Court Rules - relevant considerations LEGISLATION CITED : District Court Rules 1973, pt 19A r 2, pt 39A r 25(4) Supreme Court Rules 1970 pt 52A r 11, pt 52A r 22(4) Ettingshausen v Australian Consolidated Press Ltd (1995) 38 NSWLR 404 CASES CITED : Fotheringham v Fotheringham [No 2] (1999) 46 NSWLR 194 Maitland Hospital v Fisher [No 2] (1992) 27 NSWLR 721 Moore v Woodforth [No 2] [2003] NSWCA 46 PARTIES : K'Mart Australia Ltd (Appellant) Bruce Edward McCann (Respondent) FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 41172/03 COUNSEL : R Cavanagh (Appellant) A R Lakeman (Respondent) SOLICITORS : Hunt & Hunt (Appellant) Heazlewoods Bushby (Respondent)
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT DC 3171/02 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Andrew ADCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 41172/03
HANDLEY JA IPP JA PEARLMAN AJA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate