NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Bonat [2004] NSWCCA 240 HEARING DATE(S) : 5 July 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 19 July 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Sheller JA at 1; Sperling J at 2; Adams J at 120 DECISION : (1) Appeal allowed; (2) Convictions under counts 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 10 set aside; (3) Direct the entry of verdicts of acquittal in lieu thereof.
CATCHWORDS : Criminal law - appeal against conviction - whether inconsistent verdicts - whether verdicts of guilty unreasonable - whether to enter verdicts of acquittal or order a new trial LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules 1970 Crisologo (1997) 99 ACrimR 178 Hayes (1973) 47 ALJR 603 Jones (1997) 191 CLR 439 Lebler [2003] NSWCCA 362 Lee [2004] NSWCCA 113 M (1994) 181 CLR 487 MacKenzie (1996) 190 CLR 348 CASES CITED : Markuleski (2001) 52 NSWLR 82 MFA (2002) 193 ALJR 184 Nek [2001] NSWCCA 392 Parbury [2003] NSWCCA 120 Plomp (1963) 110 CLR 234 Raspor (1958) 99 CLR 346 Robinson (2000) 111 ACrimR 388 SBD [2003] NSWCCA 235 PARTIES : Regina Stephen Bonat FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60082/04 COUNSEL : Mr B Knox SC for the Crown Mr P Hamill for the Appellant SOLICITORS : Director of Public Prosecutions Legal Aid Commission for the Appellant
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 02/71/0018 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Norrish DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate