NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : JTEC v Industrial Development Agency (Ireland) [2003] NSWSC 10 HEARING DATE(S) : 16 December 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 10 February 2003 JURISDICTION: Equity Division JUDGMENT OF : Acting Master Berecry at 1 DECISION : Orders in accordance with paras 1 and 2 of the originating process.
CATCHWORDS : Set aside statutory demand - genuine dispute - interpretation of agreement - entire or severable contract - substantial performance - implied terms - whether serious question to be tried - defects in demand - substantial compliance - foreign currency - failure to provide adequate information - demand expressed in a defunct currency Apportionment Act 1870 (UK) LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001, s 459J(1)(a) Corporations Law Rules, R 1.7 Eyota Pty Ltd v Hanave Pty Ltd (1994) 12 ACSR 785 Edge Technology Pty Ltd v Lite-On Technology Corporation (2000) 34 ACSR 301 CASES CITED : Re: Ad-A-Cab Holdings Pty Ltd (1996) 14 ACLC 1763 Daewoo Australia Pty Ltd v Suncorp Metway Ltd (2000) 33 ACSR 481 Topfelt Pty Ltd v State Bank of New South Wales Ltd (1993) 12 ACSR 381 Aldridge Electrical Industries Pty Ltd v Mobitec AB [2001] NSWSC 823 JTEC Pty Limited (Plaintiff) PARTIES : v Industrial Development Agency (Ireland) (Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4095/02 COUNSEL : P: Mr R Bellamy D: Mr M J Walsh SOLICITORS : P: Dibbs Barker Gosling, Lawyers D: Deacons, Lawyers
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate