NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Abriel & Ors v Rothman [2004] NSWCA 40 HEARING DATE(S) : 17/12/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 18 March 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Santow JA at 2; Cripps AJA at 3 DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS : Negligence alleged against a barister - Duty to the Court - Discretion of barrister as to which argument to advance - Not raised on appeal decided in earlier litigation. (ND) Abriel v Bennett [2003]NSWCA 323 (unrep 10 Nov 2003) Reichel v McGrath (1889) 14 App Cas 665 CASES CITED : Rippon v Chilcotin Pty Ltd (2001) 53 NSWLR 198 Giannarelli v Wraith (1988) 165 CLR 543 Dey v Victorian Railway Commissioners (1949) 78 CLR 62 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways NSW (1964) 112 CLR 125 at 128-30 FIRST APPELLANT Rudolph Abriel SECOND APPELLANT PARTIES : Vera Abriel THIRD APPELLANT Premier Knits Pty Ltd RESPONDENT Stephen Rothman FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40173/03 COUNSEL : APPELLANTS - Mr Abriel in person RESPONDENT - L M Morris QC SOLICITORS : APPELLANTS - unrepresented RESPONDENT - McCabe Terrill
LOWER COURT Supreme Court - Common Law Division JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 20636/01 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Burchett AJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
- 1 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40173/03
MASON P SANTOW JA CRIPPS AJA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate