NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 58 NSWLR 700 144 A Crim R 1
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : REGINA v ELLIS [2003] NSWCCA 319 revised - 27/04/2004 HEARING DATE(S) : 21 August 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 5 November 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; Sully J at 101; O'Keefe J at 102; Hidden J at 103; Buddin J at 103 DECISION : Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : EVIDENCE - tendency and coincidence - criminal trial - admissibility - multiple counts on indictment - where trial judge admitted evidence of each offence as tendency and coincidence evidence in relation to all other offences - where trial judge applied Evidence Act 1995 s 101 in terms - whether test in Pfennig v The Queen applicable - whether tendency and coincidence evidence admissible. Crimes Act 1900 ss 112, 113, 344A LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) s 398A Evidence Act 1995 ss 94, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 110, 111, 135, 137, 141 Evidence Act 1997 (Qld) s 132A Conway v The Queen (2000) 98 FCR 204 Foley (unreported, NSW Court of Criminal Appeal, Gleeson CJ, Stein JA and Bruce J, 5 June 1997) Harriman v R (1989) 167 CLR 590 Hoch v The Queen (1988) 165 CLR 292 Markby v The Queen (1978) 140 CLR 108 Papakosmas v the Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297 Perry v The Queen (1982) 150 CLR 580 Pfennig v the Queen (1995) 182 CLR 461 R v AH (1997) 98 A Crim R 71 R v Andrews [2003] NSWCCA 7 R v Blick (2000) 111 A Crim R 326 R v Boardman [1975] AC 421 R v Camilleri (2001) 119 A Crim R 106 R v Colby [1999] NSWCCA 261 CASES CITED : R v Daley [2001] NSWSC 1211 R v Folbigg [2003] NSWCCA 17 R v Fordham (1997) 98 A Crim R 359 R v Holt [2001] NSWSC 232 R v Joiner [2002] NSWCCA 354 R v Le [2000] NSWCCA 49 R v Leask [1999] NSWCCA 33 R v Lock (1997) 91 A Crim R 356 R v OGD (No 2) (2000) 50 NSWLR 433 R v S [2001] QCA 501 R v Veitch [1999] NSWCCA 185 R v WRC (2002) 130 A Crim R 89 Sutton v The Queen (1984) 152 CLR 528 W v R (2001) 189 ALR 633 WK v SR (1997) 22 Fam LR 592 PARTIES : Regina Darren Douglas Ellis FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60764/01 COUNSEL : S J Odgers SC / H Dhanji (Appellant) R Cogswell SC / G Rowling / J Quilter (Crown) SOLICITORS : D J Humphreys (Appellant) S E O'Connor (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate