NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Design & Survey Neon P/L v Davies [2004] NSWCA 274 HEARING DATE(S) : 26 May 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 11 August 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Handley JA at 1; Santow JA at 2; Bryson JA at 61 DECISION : Appeal allowed with costs.
CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Personal injury - accident on appellant's property - though respondent once worked for appellant, at time of accident was not employed by appellant - preliminary dismissal order under Pt 1 r2A DCR made following respondent's failure to appear at a show cause hearing - two and half year delay by respondent due to continuing drug addiction, rehabilitation and problems in domestic relationship - delay in making application to set aside preliminary dismissal order - preliminary dismissal order set aside - appeal against decision setting aside preliminary dismissal order - appellant seeks to reinstate that dismissal order and so dispose of respondent's legal action - leave to appeal granted - delay in taking further steps in proceedings - whether extension of time caused prejudice to the appellant - whether Pt 1 r7A(5) DCA appropriate source of power - whether proceedings were irregular (by majority) - whether appellate intervention warranted in discretionary decision on matter of practice and procedure - extension of time should not be exercised in favour of respondent. District Court Act 1973 s68A; s81; s159 LEGISLATION CITED : District Court Rules 1973 Pt 1 r7A; Pt 3 r2; Pt.8 r.8(3); Pt 18 r3; Pt.31 r.12A Workers Compensation Act Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd v Philip Morris Inc (1981) 148 CLR 170 Bamforth v. Betcke (2003) NSWCA 116 Brisbane South Regional Health Authority v Taylor (1996) 186 CLR 541 Erhard v Bhatia [2002] NSWCA 388 FAI General Insurance Co Ltd v Southern Cross Exploration NL (1988) 165 CLR 268 Finance Facilities Pty Ltd & Ors v. Commissioner of Taxation (1970) 127 CLR 106 Fitzgerald v FJ Leonhardt Pty Ltd (1997) 189 CLR 215 Gala v Preston (1991) 172 CLR 243 Gollan v Nugent (1988) 166 CLR 18 Hardy v Motor Insurers' Bureau [1964] 2 QB 745 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 CASES CITED : Kruger v. The Commonwealth (1997) 190 CLR 1 Lovell v Lovell (1950) 81 CLR 513 Mace v Murray (1955) 92 CLR 370 Micallef v. ICI Australia Operations Ltd [2001] NSWCA 274 Nelson v Nelson (1995) 184 CLR 538 Re Will of F B Gilbert (deceased) (1946) 46 SR(NSW) 318 Saad v. Robins & Sons Pty Ltd [2003] NSWCA 87 Smith v Jenkins (1970) 119 CLR 397 Sophron v The Nominal Defendant (1957) 96 CLR 469 State of Queensland v J L Holdings Pty Ltd (1997) 189 CLR 146 Yango Pastoral Co Pty Ltd v First Chicago Australia Ltd (1978) 139 CLR 410 Zhao v Posa [2004] NSWCA 184 PARTIES : DESIGN AND SURVEY NEON PTY LIMITED (Claimant/Appellant) Stephen DAVIES (Opponent/Respondent) FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 41035/03 COUNSEL : D McLURE (Claimant/Appellant) C A VINDIN (Opponent/Respondent) SOLICITORS : Vero In House Legal (Claimant/Appellant) Bale Boshev Lawyers (Opponent/Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate