NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Sportscorp v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2004] NSWSC 1029 HEARING DATE(S) : 20/10/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 12 November 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Gzell J DECISION : Commissioner's assessments confirmed save that value of improvements to be deducted. Matter remitted to Commissioner to determine values and consider whether discount should be given for sale in one parcel.
CATCHWORDS : TAXES AND DUTIES - Stamp duties - Land acquired on behalf of partnership by trustee - Trustee developed land at expense of partners - Land subdivided on registration of strata plan - Common property vested in owners corporation - Strata lots transferred to partners as tenants in common in equal shares - Commissioner assessed transfers to ad valorem duty - Whether transfers were exempt as additional instruments forming one dutiable transaction - Whether lots transferred were the same land acquired by the trustee - Nature of rights constituted on registration of a strata plan considered - Whether exempt as transfers from apparent purchaser to real purchaser - Whether exempt as transfers from trustee to beneficiaries and wholly or substantially same property subject of declaration of trust - Whether exempt as transfers back to transferors - Whether exempt as transfers on retirement of trustee - Whether exemption for corporate reconstruction applied where one partner not member of same corporate group - Whether duty assessed on value of bare legal title - Nature of property held on trust for another discussed - Whether value of improvements paid by partnership to be deducted - Whether value of lots to be discounted for sale of all lots in one parcel Duties Act 1997 Duties Act 1997 Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) LEGISLATION CITED : Conveyancing (Strata Titles (Act) 1961 Body Corporate and Community Management Act Body Corporate and Community Management Act Real Property Act Houghton v Immer (No 155) Pty Ltd (1997) 44 NSWLR 46 Young v Owners - Strata Plan No 3529 (2001) 54 NSWLR 60 Breskvar v Wall (1971) 126 CLR 376 at 385 Chan v Cresdon Pty Ltd (1989) 168 CLR 242 Ashington Holdings Pty Ltd v Wipema Services Pty Ltd (1998) 8 BPR 15,961 Ashington Holdings Pty Ltd v Wipema Services Pty Ltd (1999) 9 BPR 17,315 Ashington Holdings Pty Ltd v Wipema Services Pty Ltd (No 2) (1998) 9 BPR 16,515 Bursill Enterprises Pty Ltd v Berger Bros Trading Co Pty Ltd (1970-1971) 124 CLR 73 Commissioner for Railways v Valuer General [1974] AC 328 at 351 Moruben Gardens Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation 72 ATC 4147 Growing Wealth Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Stamp Duties [2001] 2 Qd R 603 CASES CITED : Commissioner of State Revenue v Pattison (2001) 3 VR 520 Triantafilis v Commissioner of Stamp Duties (NSW) 95 ATC 4655 Triantafilis v Commissioner of Stamp Duties (NSW) 98 ATC 4484 Trust Company of Australia Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue (2003) 77 ALJR 1019 Dadeeton Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Taxation (2004) 88 SASR 109 Commissioner of State Revenue (Vic) v Pioneer Concrete (Vic) Pty Ltd (2002) 209 CLR 651 Vopac Terminals Australia Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue (Vic) 2004 ATC 4154 DKLR Holding Co (No 2) Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Stamp Duties (1980) 1 NSWLR 510 O'Sullivan v Commissioner of Stamp Duties (Qld) (1983) 14 ATR 299 O'Sullivan v Commissioner of Stamp Duties [1984] 1 Qd R 212 Re Transphere Pty Ltd (1986) 5 NSWLR 309 DKLR Holding Co (No 2) Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Stamp Duties (NSW) (1981-1982) 149 CLR 431 Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue (2000) 44 ATR 273 Sportscorp Australia Pty Ltd - 1st Plaintiff Addenbrooke Finance Pty Ltd - 2nd Plaintiff PARTIES : Neforu Pty Ltd - 3rd Defendant Queenscliff Estate Pty Ltd - 4th Defendant Chief Commissioner of State Revenue FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 6164/03 COUNSEL : Mr Steven Rares SC/ Mr Mark Robertson - Plaintiffs Mr Roger Hamilton/ Ms Raselle Seiden - Defendant SOLICITORS : Mallesons Stephen Jaques I V Knight Crown Solicitor
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate