NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : R v Lawrence (No. 2) [2003] NSWSC 656 revised - 19/08/2004 HEARING DATE(S) : 04/02/03 - 10/07/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 6 March 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Howie J at 1 DECISION : Subject to ruling on particular objections, the evidence of the conversations obtained as a result of the use of listening devices under warrants issued under the provisions of the Customs Act are admitted.
CATCHWORDS : Criminal Law and Procedure - Evidence - Validity of listening device warrants - Lawfulness of the use of the listening devices authorised by the warrants Customs Act 1901 - ss 219A, 219B, 219C, 219D, 219AB, 235, Div 1A Evidence Act 1995 - s 138 LEGISLATION CITED : Telecommunictions (Interception) Act - sub ss 40(1), 42, 44(1), 44(2) Crimes Act 1912 (Cth) - s 10 Halsbury's Laws of England Commonwealth Police General Orders - General Order 49 Ousley v The Queen (1997) 192 CLR 69 R v Tillett; Exparte Newton (1969) 14 FLR 101 Thompson v Goold & Co. [1910] AC 409 Caudle v Seymour (1841) 1 QB 1372 CASES CITED : Feather v Rogers (1909) 9 State Reports (NSW) 192 Selbeck v McDonald [1978] 1 NSWLR 1 English v Complaints Committee (1986) 41 SASR 217 George v Rockett (1990) 170 CLR 104 R v A [2000] SASC 51 Jackson v Wells (1985) 64 ALR 147 PARTIES : Regina v John Lawrence FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 70220/02 COUNSEL : P. Roberts SC with I. Bourke - Crown C. Waterstreet - Accused SOLICITORS : Commonwealth DPP - Crown King's Lawyers - Accused
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate