NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Finch v Rogers [2004] NSWSC 39 revised - 13/02/2004 HEARING DATE(S) : 10/11/03-14/11/03 17/11/03; 19/11/03-20/11/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 13 February 2004
JURISDICTION: Common Law Division Professional Negligence Lst JUDGMENT OF : Kirby J DECISION : Verdict for the plaintiff, with costs.; Parties to agree on calculations based on findings in judgment.
CATCHWORDS : Professional Negligence - breach of duty by doctor - causation of damage - two views accepted by profession as to treatment - whether loss of chance - proportion of worst case LEGISLATION CITED : Civil Liability Act 2002 Motor Accidents Act 1988 Chappel v Hart (1998) 195 CLR 232 Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority [1998] AC 232 Malec v J C Hutton Pty Limited (1990) 169 CLR 638 Naxakis v Western General Hospital & Anor (1999) 197 CLR 269 CASES CITED : Watts v Rake (1960) 108 CLR 158 Ruddock v Taylor [2003] NSWCA 262 Southgate v Waterford (1990) 21 NSWLR 427 Dell v Dalton (1991) 23 NSWLR 528 Van Gervan v Fenton (1992) 175 CLR 327 Mortimer v Burgess (unreported, 16.5.97, NSWCA) PARTIES : Andrew Robert Finch (Pl) Dr John Rogers (Def) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20346/02 COUNSEL : G Segal (Pl) I G Harrison SC/Ms J Lonergan (Pl) SOLICITORS : Maurice Blackburn Cashman (Pl) David Ian Brown (Def)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE LIST
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate