NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : [1] Get'm Pty Ltd v Triulcio & Anor - [2] Chase Property Investments Pty Ltd v Triulcio & Anor - [3] Chase (No 1) Property Investments Pty Ltd v Triulcio & Anor [2004] NSWSC 291 HEARING DATE(S) : 26 March, 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 26 March 2004 JURISDICTION: Equity Division JUDGMENT OF : Palmer J DECISION : Statutory demands set aside in two out of three applications, without conditions.
CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS - STATUTORY DEMAND - Applications to set aside - whether genuine dispute - whether conditions should be imposed under s.459M. LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) - s.459G, s.459M CASES CITED : - Macleay Nominees Pty Ltd v Belle Property East Pty Ltd (2001) NSWSC 743 - Panel Tech Industries v Australian Skyreach Equipment Pty Ltd (No 2) (2003) NSWSC 896 [1] Get'm Pty Limited - Plaintiff [1] Domenico Triulcio - First Defendant [1] Domenica Triulcio - Second Defendant [2] Chase Property Investments Pty Limited - Plaintiff PARTIES : [2] Domenico Triulcio - First Defendant [2] Domenica Triulcio - Second Defendant [3] Chase (No 1) Property Investments Pty Limited - Plaintiff [3] Domenico Triulcio - First Defendant [3] Domenica Triulcio - Second Defendant FILE NUMBER(S) : SC [1] 5968/03; [2] 5969/03; [3] 5985/03 COUNSEL : J. Steele - Plaintiffs J.P. Conomy - Defendants SOLICITORS : John de Mestre & Co - Plaintiffs Sachs Gerace Lawyers - Defendants
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate