NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Walshe v Prest (by her next friend Darren Prest) [2004] NSWCA 94 HEARING DATE(S) : 20 November 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 31 March 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Sheller JA at 1; Santow JA at 2; McColl JA at 3 DECISION : 1. Grant leave to appeal. 2. Subject to filing the notice of appeal within 14 days, appeal allowed. 3. Declare that, subject to the appellant paying the prescribed fee for a rehearing within 14 days of this judgment, the appellant's application for rehearing is taken to have been lawfully filed on 7 January 2003. 4. Respondent to pay the costs of the appellant and have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act if otherwise qualified. 5. The costs of the application before Delaney DCJ are to be the appellant's costs in the District Court proceedings.
CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application for rehearing of arbitration - whether Pt 51A r 10 of the District Court Rules 1973 (NSW) imposes a duty on the Registrar to endorse the date of sending on the award - whether time commences to run for the purposes of Pt 51A r 10 and s 63A(5) of the District Court Act 1973 (NSW) where the Registrar fails to endorse the date of sending on the award - where appellant's solicitor under a misapprehension as to when time commenced to run - administration of justice. Arbitration (Civil Actions) Act 1983 (NSW) s 16A, Pt 3, s 18, s 18(2), s 18A, s 18A(1), s 18B Court Legislation Amendment Bill 1998 LEGISLATION CITED : District Court Act 1973 (NSW) s 63, s 63A(1), s 63A(5), s 81 District Court Regulation 2000 (NSW) cl 4, Schedule 1, item 15 District Court Rules 1973 (NSW) Pt 3 r 2, Pt 51 r 11, Pt 51A r 9, r 9(2), r 9(5), r 10, r 10(b), r 11 Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW) s 36, s 36(1), s 80 Anlaby v Praetorius (1888) 20 QBD 764 Cropper v Smith (1884) 26 Ch D 700 El Ali v Government Insurance Office of New South Wales (1988) 15 NSWLR 303 Falconer v Laird [2003] NSWCA 114 Gallo v Dawson (1990) 64 ALJR 458 Green Leisure Group Pty Ltd v Maguire [2001] NSWCA 384 Hamp-Adams v Hall [1911] 2 KB 942 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 CASES CITED : Howard v Bodington (1877) 2 PD 203 KBRV Resort Operations Pty Ltd t/as Kingfisher Bay Resort & Village v Chilcott (2001) 51 NSWLR 516 Lindner v Wright (1976) 14 ALR 105 Multicon Engineering Pty Limited v Federal Airports Corporation (1997) 47 NSWLR 631 Nowlan v Marson Transport Pty Ltd (2001) 53 NSWLR 116 Sali v SPC Ltd (1993) 67 ALJR 841 Shepherd v Shepherd [2003] NSWCA 44; [2003] ANZ ConvR 401 State of Queensland v J L Holdings Pty Ltd (1997) 189 CLR 146 Water Board v Moustakas (1988) 180 CLR 491 PARTIES : Cheryl Walshe (Appellant) Tamara Prest (by her next friend Darren Prest) FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40213/03 COUNSEL : Mr S G Campbell SC (Appellant) Mr M J Perry (Respondent) SOLICITORS : Curwood & Partners (Appellant) Taylor & Scott (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate