NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Soyfer v Earlmaze Pty Limited [2004] NSWSC 1180 HEARING DATE(S) : 30 November 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 8 December 2004 JURISDICTION: Equity Division JUDGMENT OF : Windeyer J at 1 DECISION : Orders for distribution of funds.
CATCHWORDS : INTERPRETATION - judgment and orders - ambiguity of orders - whether orders could be interpreted by reference to reasons for judgment LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Act 1970 s95 Ecrosteel Pty Ltd (t/as Packs Business Form Brokers) v Pefor Printing Pty Ltd (unreported Santow J 12 November 1997) CASES CITED : Ex parte Fewings; In re Sneyd (1883) 25 ChD 338 Soyfer v Earlmaze Pty Ltd [2000] NSWSC 1068 Ilya Soyfer and Stella Soyfer (Plaintiffs/Respondents) Earlmaze Pty Limited (First Defendant/Cross Claimant/Applicant) PARTIES : Robert G Matar (Second Defendant/First Cross-Defendant) Simon Elcham (Second Cross-Defendant) Ratam & Mahcle Holdings Pty Limited (Third Cross-Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2818 of 2000 Mr F Gleeson (Plaintiffs/Respondents) COUNSEL : Mr T Alexis SC with him Ms C Champion (First Defendant/Applicant) Mr J Kosmin (First Cross-Defendant) No appearance (Second and Third Cross-Defendant) Horton Rhodes (Plaintiffs/Respondents) SOLICITORS : G J Gooden (First Defendant/Applicant) Kosmin & Associates (First Cross-Defendant) No Appearance (Second and Third Cross-Defendant)
- 7 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate