NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2004) Aust Torts Reports 81-744
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : MACARTHUR DISTRICTS MOTOR CYCLE SPORTSMEN INC & ORS v. ARDIZZONE [2004] NSWCA 145 HEARING DATE(S) : 30/04/2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 20 May 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Hodgson JA at 1; Bryson JA at 18; Stein AJA at 61; DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS : NEGLIGENCE - standard of care - participants in game - inherent danger - respondent (plaintiff) boy aged 12 y.o. took part in motor cross (motorcycle) race organised by appellants (defendants) sporting associations - respondent fell off at jump, lay winded on track and was struck and injured by following rider - Trial Judge found breach of duty of care which required stationing sufficient marshalls in positions to intervene and signal with yellow flag to other riders - sport inherently dangerous - consideration of standard of care (Shirt Calculus) and significance of respondent's knowledge of risk from absence of marshalls and of warning from his father - decisions of Trial Judge on standard of care, breach and causation upheld. - DAMAGES - future economic loss - consideration (by Hodgson JA) of operation of s.13 of Civil Liability Act. - LAW REFORM - further economic loss - Hodgson JA expressed view that s.13 required Parliamentary reconsideration. (D) LEGISLATION CITED : Civil Liability Act 2002 Rootes v. Shelton (1967) 116 CLR 383 Woods v. Multi-Sport Holdings Pty Ltd (2002) 208 CLR 460. CASES CITED : Wyong Shire Council v. Shirt (1980) 146 CLR 40 Agar v Hyde (2000) 201 CLR 552 Jones v. Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Macarthur Districts Motor Cycle Sportsmen Inc. - First Appellant Motorcycle Sports NSW Incorporated (Previously known as) Motorcycling Australia (NSW) Incorporated and Motorcycling New South Wales Incorported - Second Appellant PARTIES : Motorcycling Australia Limited - Third Appellant Daniel Ardizzone - Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate