NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 59 NSWLR 596 145 A Crim R 453
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Ohar [2004] NSWCCA 83 HEARING DATE(S) : 22/03/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 23 April 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Studdert J at 1; James J at 2; Dunford J at 89 DECISION : (1) Crown appeal dismissed (2) Prisoner's application for leave to appeal - leave to appeal granted but appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS : Criminal law - sentencing- principles - Drug Court - competency of appeals - constitution of Court of Criminal Appeal - delay in instituting Crown appeal - statutory non-parole periods Crimes Act Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Appeal Act Criminal Appeal Rules Drug Court Act House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Johnson v The Queen [2004] HCA 15 (30 March 2004) Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 Wong v The Queen; Leung v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584 R v Baker [2000] NSWCCA 85 CASES CITED : R v El-Hamid [2000] NSWCCA 497 R v Giam (No. 2) (1999) 109 A Crim R 348 R v Hallocoglu (1992) NSWLR 67 R v Hammoud (2000) 118 A Crim R 66 R v Hernando [2002] NSWCCA 489 R v Itamua [2000] NSWCCA 502 R v Wong & Leung (1999) 108 A Crim R 531 PARTIES : Regina v Adam OHAR FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60451/03 COUNSEL : H Dhanji - Applicant G Rowling - Respondent SOLICITORS : S O'Connor - Applicant S Kavanagh - Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate