NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Doiho Pty Ltd v Waycity Pty Ltd & Anor [2003] NSWSC 578 HEARING DATE(S) : 17 June 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 30 June 2003 JURISDICTION: Common Law JUDGMENT OF : Master Harrison DECISION : (1) The application for an extension of time to appeal is refused; (2) The summons is dimissed; (3) The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs as agreed or assessed.
CATCHWORDS : Extension of time to appeal decision of Fair Trading Tribunal - lease - ostensible authority of real estate agent LEGISLATION CITED : Fair Trading Tribunal Act - s 60 Consumer Trader, Tenancy Tribunal Act 2001 - sch 6 cl 6 Crabtree Vickers Pty Ltd v Australian Direct Mail Advertising and Addressing Co Pty Ltd (1975) 133 CLR 72 CASES CITED : Freeman and Lockyer v Buckhurst Park (Mangal) Ltd (1964) 2 QB 480 Gallo v Dawson [1990] ALR 479 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Doiho Pty Ltd (Plaintiff)
PARTIES : Waycity Pty Ltd (First Defendant)
Venesh Harjeet Singh (Second Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 12704/2002 Ms N Obrart (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : Mr David Patch (First Defendant)
Mr Joe Ryan (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Mr L Hopper of Lynden E Hopper & Co (First Defendant)
LOWER COURT Fair Trading Tribunal JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT CM 1999/7470 & BU 1998/1106 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Member J Deamer and Member S Montgomery JUDICIAL OFFICER :
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate