NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Kipic; Regina v Elias [2004] NSWCCA 452 revised - 14/12/2004 HEARING DATE(S) : 1 December 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 10 December 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Tobias JA at 1; Sully J at 2; Hoeben J at 72 DECISION : Sentences quashed and respondents re-sentenced. See paragraph 69 of judgment.
Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED : Drug Misuse & Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Reg v Clark (unreported) NSWCCA, 15 March 1990 Zamagias [2002] NSWCCA 17 Le Cerf (1975) 8 ALR 349 at 351 CASES CITED : Thomson and Houlton Jurisic (1998) 45 NSWLR 209 Wong v The Queen [2001] 207 CLR 584 Trindall [2002] NSWCCA 364 Palu [2002] NSWCCA 381 PARTIES : Regina v Stephanie Snezana KIPIC Regina v Roger ELIAS FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 2004/2128; 2004/2129 J. Girdham - Crown COUNSEL : M. Paish - Respondent Kipic L. Rowan - Respondent Elias SOLICITORS : S. Kavanagh - Crown S. O'Connor - Respondents
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 03/21/0238; 03/21/0299 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Nicholson DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
- 24 - IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2004/2128 2004/2129
TOBIAS JA SULLY J HOEBEN J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate