NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Schmierer & Anor v Taouk [2004] NSWSC 345 HEARING DATE(S) : 27/04/04, 28/04/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 7 May 2004
JUDGMENT OF : White J DECISION : See Conclusion Page 29
CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS - Winding-up - Plaintiff liquidator seeking recovery of two payments to director under s 598(2) and (4) of Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) - Alleged negligence, default and breach of fiduciary duty - Whether duty of director not to prefer personal interest to company's interests - Whether money recoverable on other basis - Whether sum recoverable as loan - Plaintiff's onus of proof in showing nature of money advanced to defendant - Nature of loan - Nature of restitutionary obligation to repay - Whether and from when interest payable - Whether withdrawal of funds from bank constituted breach of defendant's director's duties - Whether amount consequently recoverable by liquidator under s 598(2) of Corporations Act - Whether shareholders can ratify director's breach where latter leads to company's insolvency - Whether defendant entitled to relief under s 1318 Corporations Act. - (CTH) Corporations Act 2001 ss 598, 1318. Corporations Law s 233, s 461 (k) LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001, s 598 (2), s 1318 Supreme Court Act, s 92 Walker v Wimborne (1976) 137 CLR 1 at 37 Re New World Alliance Pty Ltd Sycotex Pty Ltd v Baseler (1994) 51 FCR 425 at 444-445 Ferguson v O'Neill [1943] VLR 30 at 32 Pannam, The Law of Moneylenders Australia & New Zealand (1965) Heydon v Perpetual Executors Trustees and Agency Co (WA) Ltd (1930) 45 CLR 111 at 113 Oubert v Walsh (1812) 4 Taunt. 294 128 E.R. 342 Joaquin v Hall [1976] VR 788 Jenkins v Wynen [1992] 1 QdR 40 at 43-44 Motor Auction Pty Ltd v John Joyce Wholesale Cars Pty Ltd (1997) 23 ACSR 647 at 660 Coshott v Sakic (1998) 667 at 671-672 Mason & Carter, Restitution Law in Australia Seldon v Davidson (1968) 2 All ER 755 at 757, 759. CASES CITED : Cary v Gerrish (1801) 4 ESP. 9 170 E.R. 624 Welsh v Seabourne (1816) 1 Stark. 474 171 E.R. 534 Baltic Shipping Company v Dillon (1993) 176 CLR 344 at 356-357 Roxborough v Rothmans of Pall Mall (2001) 208 CLR 516 at 525, 540, 550-551 Bullen & Leake, Precedents of Pleadings, 3 Ed Moses v McFerlan 2 Burr. 1005, 1110 97 E.R. 676 Halsbury's Laws of England, 4 Ed, Para 672 Star v O'Brien (1996) 40 NSWLR 695 at 701 Goff & Jones, The Law of Restitution, 5 Ed p 848 Baker v Courage [1910] 1 KB 56 Maskell v Horner [1915] 3 KB 106 Torrens Aloha Pty Ltd v Citibank NA (1997) 72 FCR 581 Trevor John Schmierer & Anor PARTIES : v Fahd Taouk FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 005721/2001 COUNSEL : Plaintiff: Mark Ashhurst Defendant: Robert Tregenza SOLICITORS : Plaintiff: Levitt Robinson Solicitors Defendant: Malouf Solicitors
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate