NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : ACTIC Pty Ltd v Cabool & UPRE [2004] NSWSC 302 HEARING DATE(S) : 9 October 2003; 28 & 29 October 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 19 April 2004 JURISDICTION: Equity Division JUDGMENT OF : Smart AJ at 1 DECISION : See para 173
CATCHWORDS : Contract for sale of land - Effect of cl 10.1.5 - precludes claim for innocent misrepresentation based on a conversation - Trade Practices Act claims not sustainable - Deposit not refundable - Duties Act 1997 - Construction of s 50 and effect of endorsement by Chief Commissioner "No Duty Payable" - Contract bearing this endorsement admissible in evidence. Conveyancing Act 1919 LEGISLATION CITED : Duties Act 1997 Taxation Administration Act 1996 Trade Practices Act 1974 (or s 42 of the Fair Trading Act) Ash Street properties Pty Ltd v Pollnow (1987) 9 NSWLR 80. Concrete Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd v Nelson (1990) 169 CLR 594 CASES CITED : Dent v Moore (1919) 26 CLR 316 Fineglow Pty Limited v Anastaopoulos [2002] NSWSC 1181 M & W Holdings Pty Ltd v Exbea Pty Ltd 89 ATC 4,335. Wilcox Mofflin v Commissioner of Stamp Duties (NSW) 78 ATC 4,191 PARTIES : The Australian Customer Target Information Company Pty Limited (ACTIC) v Cabool Holdings Pty Limited (CABOOL) and Ultimo-Pyrmont Real Estate Pty Limited (UPRE) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3416/00 (P) Mr Galitsky COUNSEL : (D1) Mr Epstein SC (D2) Mr Wood (P) Haylen McKenzie SOLICITORS : (D1) Frank Low Yeung & Co (D2) Piggott Stinson Ratner Thom
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate