NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : REGINA v Wayne BALDWIN [2004] NSWCCA 21 HEARING DATE(S) : 18/2/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 22 March 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Levine J at 1; O'Keefe J at 2; Bell J at 3 DECISION : 1. Allow the appeal; 2. Quash the convictions and sentences imposed in the District Court; 3. In relation to count 17 direct judgment and verdict of acquittal; 4. Direct a new trial with respect to the balance of the indictment
LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 L v Johnson and the DPP [2003] NSWSC 1246 BRS v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 275 Maric v R (1978) 52 ALJR 631 R v Anderson (1991) 53 A Crim R 421 CASES CITED : R v ATM [2000] NSWCCA 475 R v Dixon [2001] NSWCCA 39 R v Goldburg, Court of Criminal Appeal, unreported, 23 February 1993 R v RNS [1999] NSWCCA 122 R v Tolmie, Court of Criminal Appeal, unreported, 7 December 1994 Williams v Spautz (1992) 174 CLR 509 PARTIES : Wayne BALDWIN (Appellant) Crown (Respondent) FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60332/03 COUNSEL : M Thangaraj (Appellant) E Wilkins (Crown) SOLICITORS : C Abbott (Appellant) CK Smith (Crown)
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 01/11/0491 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Shillington DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60332/03
LEVINE J O'KEEFE J BELL J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate