NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Vaiela Pty Ltd (as Trustee of the Pollicino Family Trust & Ors v Trisley [2003] NSWSC 873 HEARING DATE(S) : 4 - 7 August, 11 - 14 August 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 2 October 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Cripps AJ DECISION : (i) suit dismissed; (ii) the plaintiffs to pay the defendant's costs.
CATCHWORDS : fiduciary duty - negligence - misrepresentations - equitable compensation and/or common law entitlement to recovery of expenditure in unsuccessful litigation LEGISLATION CITED : Limitation Act 1969 (NSW), s23 Burke v LFOT Pty Ltd (2002) 209 CLR 282 Dering v Earl of Winchelsea (1787) 29 ER 1184 Livingstone v Raywards Coal Co (1880) 5 App Cas 25 Maguire & Tansey v Makaronis (1997) 188 CLR 449 O'Halloran v RT Thomas and Family Pty Ltd (1998) 45 NSWLR 262 CASES CITED : Pilmer v The Duke Group Ltd (in liquidation) (2001) 207 CLR 165 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun (1981) 147 CLR 589 Reichel v Magrath (1889) 14 App Cas 655 Rippon v Chilcotin Pty Ltd (2001) 53 NSWLR 198 Security and Exchange Commission v Chenery Corporation (1943) 318 US 80 Target Holdings Redfern Holdings [1996] 1 AC 421 Vaiela Pty Ltd - 1st Plaintiff PARTIES : Francesco Pollicino - 2nd Plaintiff Teresa Maria Pollicino - 3rd Plaintiff Lawrence Paul Trisley - Defendant FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20095/97 COUNSEL : DL Williams - Plaintiffs JT Gleeson SC with A Lo Sordo - Defendant SOLICITORS : McCave Terrill Lawyers - Plaintiffs Phillips Fox - Defendants
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate