NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Merlino [2004] NSWCCA 104 HEARING DATE(S) : 7/04/2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 21 April 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Wood CJ at CL at 1; Sully J at 81; Hislop J at 82 DECISION : Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - Appeal against conviction - 2 counts of robbery armed with offensive weapon - plea of not guilty - whether trial judge erred in directions to jury on circumstantial evidence - whether prejudice caused by trials being run together - whether miscarriage due to jury being made aware that appellant and his alibi witness had been in prison - whether Crown cross examination invited adverse inferences relating to onus of proof and right to silence of appellant. LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 - s 103 KRM The Queen (2001) 206 CLR 221 at 234 Petty v The Queen (1991) 173 CLR 95 Regina v Anderson [2002] NSWCCA 141 CASES CITED : Regina v ITA [2003] NSWCCA 174 Regina v Merritt [1999] NSWCCA 29 at 71 R v Reeves (1992) 29 NSWLR 109 Regina v Zaiter [2004] NSWCCA 35 Shepherd v The Queen (1990) 170 CLR 573 at 585 PARTIES : Regina Mario Joseph Merlino FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60479/03 COUNSEL : D M L Woodburne (Crown) H. Dhanji SOLICITORS : C K Smith (Crown) S E O'Connor
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 02/21/1177 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Robison DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
- 24 - IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60479/03
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate