NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Regal Pearl v Zurich Australian Insurance [2004] NSWSC 321 HEARING DATE(S) : 14 and 15 April 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 22 April 2004 JURISDICTION: Common Law Division JUDGMENT OF : Master Malpass DECISION : Leave is granted pursuant to s 6 of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 to commence an action against the defendant. The defendant is to pay the costs of the Summons. The Exhibits may be returned.
CATCHWORDS : Leave to commence action against insurer - onus of proof - arguable case and disputed questions of construction of insurance policy (cover and exclusions). LEGISLATION CITED : Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946, s 6 (4). Sale of Goods Act 1923, s 19. Allianz Australia Ltd v Wentworthville Real Estate Pty Ltd & 2 Ors [2004] NSWCA 100. Karenlee Nominees Pty Ltd v ACN 004 312 234 Ltd (1994) 8 ANZ Ins Cas 61 - 236. CASES CITED : Leighton Contractors v AMP General Insurance [2003] NSWSC 839. Rolls Royce Industrial Power (Pacific) Ltd v James Hardie & Co Pty Ltd (2001) 53 NSWLR 626. State Government Insurance Office (Qld) v Crittenden (1966) 117 CLR 412. Regal Pearl Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) PARTIES : v Zurich Australian Insurance Limited (Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 11173 of 2003 COUNSEL : Mr R Cavanagh (Plaintiff) Mr L King SC/Mr J Gracie (Defendant) SOLICITORS : Holman Webb Lawyers (Plaintiff) Goldrick Farrell Mullan (Defendant)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate