NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : SUTHERLAND SHIRE COUNCIL v HENSHAW [2004] NSWCA 386 HEARING DATE(S) : 21/10/2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 10 December 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Sheller JA at 1; Hodgson JA at 18; Bryson JA at 24 DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS : NEGLIGENCE - highway - pedestrian injured by fall at hole in broken edge of asphalt paving on footpath - consideration of significance of observability of hazard - consideration whether duty of care owed if the hazard can be observed by pedestrian - extensive consideration of Brodie at [163] - Trial Judge's findings of negligence and no contributory negligence were reasonably available - appeal dismissed LEGISLATION CITED : Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1965 s.10 Highways Act 1980 (U.K.) s.41 Brodie v Singleton Shire Council; Ghantous v Hawkesbury Shire Council (2001) 206 CLR 512 Searle v. Metropolitan Water, Sewerage and Drainage Board (1936) 13 LGR 115 Tame v New South Wales; Annetts v Australian Stations Pty Limited (2002) 211 CLR 317 Webb v. The State of South Australia [1982] 56 ALJR 912 Wyong Shire Council v. Shirt (1980) 146 CLR 40 Smith v. Broken Hill Proprietary Co Ltd (1957) 97 CLR 337 Miller v. McKeon (1905) 3 CLR 50 Liftronic Pty Ltd v. Unver (2001) 75 ALJR 867 Pelley v. The Maitland Benevolent Society [2004] NSWCA 323 Alford v. Magee (1952) 85 CLR 437. CASES CITED : Richmond Valley Council v. Standing (2002) 127 LGERA 237 Burwood Council v. Byrnes [2002] NSWCA 343 Rallis v. Pang [2003] NSWCA 202 Temora Shire Council v. Stein [2004] NSWCA 236 Newcastle City Council v. Lindsay [2004] NSWCA 198 Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Limited v. Ryan (2002) 211 CLR 540 Boroondara City Council v. Cattanach [2004] VSCA 139 Greater Shepparton City Council v. Davis [2004] VSCA 140 Almeda v. Attorney General for Gibraltar [2003] UKPC 81 Gorringe v. Transport Commission (Tasmania) (1950) 80 CLR 357 Thompson v. Hampshire County Council [2004] EWCA (Civ) 1016 Avenhouse v. Hornsby S.C. (1998) 44 NSWLR 1 PARTIES : Sutherland Shire Council - Appellant William Henshaw - Respondent FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40104 of 2004 COUNSEL : P.R. Garling SC and K. Morgan - Appellant S. Norton SC and M. Fraser - Respondent SOLICITORS : Phillips Fox - Appellant Bryden's Law Office - Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate