NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 51 ACSR 102 (2004) 22 ACLC 1517
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : WORKCOVER AUTHORITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES v PICTON TRUCK & TRAILER REPAIRS PTY LTD (DE-REGISTERED) & ANOR [2004] NSWCA 371 HEARING DATE(S) : 23 September 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 15 October 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Sheller JA at 2; Ipp JA at 29 DECISION : Upon the appellant through its counsel undertaking; (a) to advise Mr M J M Smith, the reinstated liquidator of the first respondent, and ASIC when any proposed action of the applicant involving the company has finished; and (b) to indemnify Mr M J M Smith for any proper fees, costs and expenses associated with his reinstatement as liquidator of the company, including any subsequent de-registration of the company; 1. Appeal allowed; 2. The orders made by Gzell J on 18 September 2003 be set aside; 3. The registration of Picton Truck & Trailer Repairs Pty Ltd (De-registered) be reinstated; 4. The second respondent, Keith Richard Aiken, pay the appellant's costs of the appeal and of the proceedings below.
CATCHWORDS : APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT - s601AH(2) Corporations Act 2001 - reinstatement sought for purpose of serving notice for reimbursement under s145 Workers Compensation Act 1987 in order to recover from culpable director - whether person aggrieved - whether in public interest - whether discretion to refuse application on grounds of delay by WorkCover Corporations Act 2001 LEGISLATION CITED : Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) Finance Facilities Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1971) 127 CLR 106 GIS Electrical Pty Ltd v Melsom (2003) 43 ACSR 481 CASES CITED : Liddell v Lembke (1994) 127 ALR 342 Northbourne Developments Pty Ltd v Reiby Chambers (1989) 19 NSWLR 434 Re Austral Group Investment Management Ltd [1993] 2 NZLR 692 WorkCover Authority of NSW - Appellant PARTIES : Picton Truck & Trailer Repairs Pty Ltd (De-registered) - First Respondent Keith Richard Aiken - Second Respondent FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40890/03 COUNSEL : D R Pritchard - Appellant M J Cohen - Second Respondent SOLICITORS : Turks Legal - Appellant Dignan & Hanrahan - Second Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate