NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Craig Andrew Rosenkranz v John Patrick Dessaix [2003] NSWSC 1085 HEARING DATE(S) : 20/11/2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 20 November 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Dunford J DECISION : Application to direct verdict - judgment for defendant refused.
CATCHWORDS : Jury - civil proceedings - application for directed verdict - relevant principles applicable LEGISLATION CITED : Courts Legislation Amendment (Civil Juries) Act 2001 Supreme Court Rules Pt 34 r 8(2) Carlisle v Mullrai Pty Limited & Ors [2000] NSWCA 190 De Gioia v Darling Island Stevedoring & Lighterage Co Ltd (1941) 42 SR (NSW) 1 Hocking v Bell (1944) 44 SR (NSW) 468, (1945) 71 CLR 430, (1947) 75 CLR 125 PC Hunt v Watkins [2000] NSWCA 229, 49 NSWLR 508 CASES CITED : Mailman v Ellison (Court of Appeal - 25 November 1993 - unreported) March v E & M.H. Stramare Pty Limited (1991) 171 CLR 506 Naxakis v West General Hospital [1999] HCA 22, 197 CLR 269 Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales v Jackson [2003] NSWCA 40 Rundle v The State Rail Authority of New South Wales [2002] NSWCA 354 Wyong Shire Council v Shirt (1980) 146 CLR 40 PARTIES : Craig Andrew Rosenkranz v John Patrick Dessaix FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 11840/92 COUNSEL : J J Graves SC & S W Davis- Plaintiff K P Rewell SC & A R Beardow - Defendant SOLICITORS : T D Kelly & Co - Plaintiff Phillips Fox - Defendant
- 1 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate