NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : REGINA v NG, REGINA v LEW [2003] NSWSC 781 revised - 2/09/2003 HEARING DATE(S) : 25/5/03 - 28/5/03, 2/6/03 - 5/6/03, 10/6/03 - 13/6/03, 16/6/03 - 20/6/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 20 August 2003 JURISDICTION: Common Law JUDGMENT OF : Adams J at 1 DECISION : David Ng: Sentenced on the charge of armed robbery to a fixed term of seven years' imprisonment to commence on 6 July 2001 and expire on 5 July 2008. In respect of the crime of murder you are sentenced to a term of thirty-five years' imprisonment to commence on 6 July 2003 and expire on 5 July 2038. The overall sentence is therefore thirty-seven years. I impose a non-parole period of twenty-seven years and nine months. The earliest date upon which you will be eligible for parole is 5 April 2029; Teck Lee Lew: For the crime of being an accessory before the fact to attempted robbery you are sentenced to a fixed term of imprisonment of three years commencing 5 July 2001 and ending on 4 July 2004. In respect of the offence of being an accessory before the fact to the crime of robbery with an offensive weapon, you are senenced to a fixed term of imprisonment of five years commencing on 5 July 2002 and expiring on 4 July 2007. In respect of the crime of being an accessory before the fact to murder, you are sentenced to a term of imprisonment of fourteen years commencing on 5 July 2002 and expiring on 4 July 2016. The overall sentence is therefore fifteen years. I impose a non-parole period of twelve years. The earliest date upon which you will be eligible for release is 4 July 2013.
CATCHWORDS : Criminal law - sentence - murder - accessory before the fact - robbery - level of culpability - plea of guilty for one offender - parity of sentence - Victim Impact Statement - sentencing principles LEGISLATION CITED : ss 22, 23 & 44 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1989 PARTIES : Regina v David Ng Regina v Teck Lee Lew FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 70238/02; 70116/02 Mr P Barrett (Crown) COUNSEL : Mr M McColm (Ng) Mr M Higgins (Lew) S E O'Connor (Crown) SOLICITORS : Mark Klees & Associates (Ng) Hartmann & Associates (Lew)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate