NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Tan Hung Nguyen & Anor v Luxury Design Homes Pty Limited & 2 Ors [2004] NSWCA 178 HEARING DATE(S) : 22/10/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 11 June 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Hodgson JA at 1; McColl JA at 12; Einstein J at 57 DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS : Building and construction - Contract - progress payments - disputes over second progress payment - referral to referee for report under Pt 28B r 2(1) of the District Court Rules 1973 - referee's report adopted by trial judge - appeal against reasons given in judgment - proper construction of the contract - insufficiency of reasons - proper approach to calculations - construction of termination clause - whether contract an "entire contract" - whether entire performance a condition precedent to payment - rule in Sumpter v Hedges [1898] 1 QB 673 - Proper construction of contract to exclude common law rights to relief for repudiatory conduct LEGISLATION CITED : District Court Rules 1973 Baltic Shipping Co v Dillon (1993) 176 CLR 344 Banbury & Cheltenham Direct Railway Co v Daniel (1884) 54 LJ Ch 265 Besser Industries (NT) Pty Ltd v Steelcon Constructions Pty Ltd (1995) 129 ALR 308 Biscayne Partners Pty Ltd v Valance Corp Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 874 Brewarrina Shire Council v Beckhaus Civil Pty Ltd [2003] NSWCA 4; 56 NSWLR 576 Carpenter v McGrath (1996) 40 NSWLR 39 Chalet Homes Pty Limited v Kelly [1978] Qd R 389 Commonwealth v Amann Aviation Pty Ltd (1991) 174 CLR 64 Connor v Stainton (1924) 27 WALR 72 Corio Guarantee Corporation Ltd v McCallum [1956] VLR 755 Dawnays Ltd v FG Minter Ltd and Trollope and Colls Ltd [1971] 1 WLR 1205 Egan v State Transport Authority (1982) 31 SASR 481 GEC Marconi Systems Pty Limited v BHP Information Technology Pty Limited (2003) 128 FCR 1; [2003] FCA 50 Gilbert-Ash (Northern) Limited v Modern Engineering (Bristol) Limited [1974] AC 689 Hoenig v Isaacs [1952] 2 All ER 176 Hungry Jacks Pty Ltd v Burger King Corp [1999] NSWSC 1029 CASES CITED : Hyundai Heavy Industries Co Ltd v Papadopoulos [1980] 1 WLR 1229 McLachlan v Nourse [1928] SASR 230 Madras, The [1898] P 90 Mahoney v Lindsay (1980) 55 ALJR 118 Markham & Andrews v Bernales (1906) 8 WALR 208 Mertens v Home Freeholds Company [1921] 2 KB 526 Ownit Homes Pty Ltd v Batchelor [1983] 2 Qd R 124 Peter Turnbull & Co. Pty. Ltd. v Mundus Trading Co (Australasia) Pty Limited (1954) 90 CLR 235 Philips v Ellinson Brothers Pty Ltd (1941) 65 CLR 221 Pickering v Ilfracombe Railway Company (1868) LR3CP 235 Robinson v Harman (1848) 1 Exch 850 Rocci & Anor v Diploma Construction Pty Ltd [2004] WASC 18 Sanders Constructions Pty Ltd, Re [1969] Qd R 29 Steele v Tardiani (1946) 72 CLR 386 Sumpter v Hedges [1898] 1 QB 673 Tharsis Sulphur and Copper Company v McElroy & Sons (1878) 3 App Cas 1040 Walsh v Kinnear (1876) 14 SCR(NSW) 434 Wenham v Ella (1972) 127 CLR 454 Tan Hung Nguyen (First Appellant) Cam Dung Lu (Second Appellant) PARTIES : Luxury Design Homes Pty Limited (ACN 003 129 815) (First Respondent) Lyn Frohlich (Second Respondent) Jack Reitsma (Third Respondent) FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40200/03 COUNSEL : Dr C Vaccaro (First and Second Appellants) Miss E Olsson SC, Mr Walsh (First, Second and Third Respondents) SOLICITORS : Mark Mullins (First and Second Appellants) Turnbull Bowles Lawyers (First, Second and Third Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate