NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Stankowski v Commonwealth of Australia [2003] NSWSC 923 HEARING DATE(S) : 8/10/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 10 October 2003
JUDGMENT OF : O'Keefe J DECISION : 1. For more abundant caution, the order made by Bell J on 25 September 2003 is discharged; 2. The issues of fact in the matter be tried without a jury; 3. The trial continue before me sitting alone; 4. The evidence already given in the presence of the jury be evidence in the proceedings before me; 5. I give leave to the defendant to recall for further cross-examination any witness already called whose cross-examination the defendant reasonably claims would have been different had that witness been cross-examined other than before the jury; 6. I reserve the question of costs including, but not limited to, the costs incurred as a consequence of the recall of any witness who has given evidence to date.
CATCHWORDS : Practice and procedure - Discharge of jury - Jurisdiction to order hearing without jury - Judge continuing to hear matter without jury - Evidence in proceedings before jury - Order after discharge of jury for evidence in proceedings before jury to be evidence in continuing trial - Test - interests of justice - Discretion - Grounds for exercise of discretion to continue trial without jury Courts Legislation Amendment (Civil Juries) Act 2001 LEGISLATION CITED : District Court Act 1973: ss 77, 78, 79, 79A Supreme Court Act 1970: ss 85, 86, 87, 88, 89 Csalar v Circosta (2002) 55 NSWLR 212 Girlach v Clifton Bricks Pty Ltd (2002) 209 CLR 478 CASES CITED : Jakamarra v Krakouer (1998) 195 CLR 516 Pace v Read (2000) 179 ALR 437 Pambula District Hospital v Herriman (1988) 14 NSWLR 287 Patton v Buchanan Borehole Collieries Pty Ltd (1992-1993) 178 CLR 14 PARTIES : Steven Stankowski Commonwealth of Australia FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 21240/95 COUNSEL : Plaintiff - Mr A Melick SC with Dr K Sant Defendant - Mr R Burbidge QC with Mr G Johnson SOLICITORS : Plaintiff - James Taylor & Co, Solicitors Defendant - Australian Government Solicitor
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate