NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Donaghy v Wentworth Area Health Service [2003] NSWSC 533 HEARING DATE(S) : 16/06/03, 18/06/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 18 June 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Shaw J DECISION : (1) Application of the defendant to adjourn is refused; (2) Application of the plaintiff for evidence in chief to be taken on affidavit is allowed.
CATCHWORDS : Interlocutory application - whether to grant adjournment - whether plaintiff can give evidence by way of affidavit - query whether open to the Court for the plaintiff to be interrogated LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW) Part 24, 33 Bonhote v Henderson [1895] 1 Ch 742; Bourke v Davis (1890) 44 Ch D 110; Estex Clothing Manufacturers Pty Ltd v Ellis and Goldstein Ltd (1967) 116 CLR 254; CASES CITED : Lindsay-Owen v Lake [2000] NSWSC 1046; Linfox Transport (Aust) Pty Ltd v Ellul [2003] NSWSC 396; Protective Commissioner v B (Unreported, NSWSC, Hodgson J, 23 June 1997); The Parisian (1888) LR 13 PD 16; PARTIES : Carolyn Annette Donaghy - Plaintiff Wentworth Area Health Service - Defendant FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20012/01 COUNSEL : D Wheelahan, QC with A McSpedden - Plaintiff J Maconachie, QC with F Doak - Defendant SOLICITORS : Bell and Partners - Plaintiff TurksLegal - Defendant
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
Shaw J
18 June 2003
20012 of 2001
Carolyn Annette Donaghy (Plaintiff)
v
Wentworth Area Health Service (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate