NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : State Transit Authority of NSW v Australian Jockey Club [2003] NSWSC 726 HEARING DATE(S) : 31/07/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 8 August 2003 JURISDICTION: Equity Division JUDGMENT OF : Young CJ in Eq DECISION : Three of the four caveats are to be removed forthwith: the fourth on 11 September 2003. The cross claim for right of way fails, but that for a sewerage easement succeeds. Generally, the plaintiff is entitled to succeed that it has the right to sell an unencumbered title to the second cross defendant.
CATCHWORDS : CONTRACTS [2]- Tender- Whether process contract- Whether obligation to treat all tenderers equally. CONVEYANCING [158]- Torrens system- Easements- Whether prescriptive easement may exist if no change in registered proprietor for whole period. REAL PROPERTY [413]- Easements- Right of way- 20 years use- Torrens system land- Land owned by Crown- Although user established, no easement existed. Conveyancing Act 1919, s 178 LEGISLATION CITED : Fair Trading Act 1987, s 3 Transport Administration Act 1988, s 22 Albon v Dremsall (1610) 1 Brownlow 216; 123 ER 763 Australian Hi-Fi Publications Pty Ltd v Gehl [1979] 2 NSWLR 618 Bahr v Nicolay (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 604 Barba v Gas & Fuel Corporation of Victoria (1976) 136 CLR 120 Corrections Corporation of Australia Pty Ltd v Commonwealth of Australia (2000) 104 FCR 448 Dobbie v Davidson (1991) 21 NSWLR 625 Evans Deakin Pty Ltd v Sebel Furniture Ltd [2003] FCA 71 Frazer v Walker [1967] 1 AC 569 Golding v Tanner (1991) 56 SASR 482 Hamilton v Joyce [1984] 3 NSWLR 279 Hughes Aircraft Systems International v Air Services Australia (1997) 76 FCR 151 J S McMillan Pty Ld v Commonwealth (1997) 77 FCR 337 Jobson v Nankervis (1943) 44 SR (NSW) 277 CASES CITED : Kostis v Devitt (1979) 1 BPR 9231 Maurice Toltz Pty Ltd v Macy's Emporium Pty Ltd [1970] 1 NSWR 474 McKenzie v Waimumu Queen Gold-Dredging Co Ltd (1901) 21 NZLR 231 NT Power Generation Pty Ltd v Power & Water Authority (2001) 184 ALR 481 Pearch v Gyucha (1953) 71 WN (NSW) 123 Pekel v Humich (1999) 21 WAR 24 Pratt Contractors Ltd v Palmerstone North City Council [1995] 1 NZLR 469 Pugh v Savage [1970] 2 QB 373 South Eastern Railway Co v Associated Portland Cement Manufacturers (1900) Ltd [1910] 1 Ch 12 Talga Investments Pty Ltd v Tweed Canal Estates Pty Ltd (1974) 1 BPR 9675 Transit New Zealand v Pratt Contractors Ltd [2002] 2 NZLR 313 Turner v Walsh (1880) 1 LR (NSW) 83; (1881) 6 App Cas 636 (PC)) United Starr-Bowkett Co-operative Building Society (No 11) Ltd v Clyne (1967) 68 SR (NSW) 331 Wimbledon & Putney Commons Conservators v Dixon (1875) 1 Ch D 362 State Transit Authority of New South Wales (P) PARTIES : Australian Jockey Club (D1) Treve Williams (D2) Anson City Developments 1 (Australia) Pty Limited (2nd cross defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3409/03 B A Coles QC and L J Aitken (P) COUNSEL : J Sackar QC and R McHugh (D2) I M Khan (2nd cross defendant) Abbott Tout (P) SOLICITORS : Mallesons Stephen Jaques (D2) Allens Arthur Robinson (2nd cross defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate