NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Endeavour Film Management Pty Ltd & Anor v Fox Studios Australia Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 1056 HEARING DATE(S) : 13 November 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 17 November 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Gzell J DECISION : Appeal allowed. Statutory demand to be set aside. Conditions to be imposed requiring the appellants to prosecute the District Court proceedings with dispatch.
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE - Supreme Court Procedure - Appeal from a Master - Application to set aside a statutory demand - Litigant in person appearing for company - Whether leave should have been given to adduce oral evidence as to damages in an off-setting claim in the District Court - Whether additional affidavit setting out that evidence should be admitted on appeal - Whether claim to set aside, not raised in the affidavit supporting the orginating process is open - Whether a case in equitable estoppel had been made out - Whether conditions should be attached to the setting aside of the statutory demand Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules 1970 Supreme Court Act 1970 Do Carmo v Ford Excavations Pty Ltd (1981) 1 NSWLR 409 Morrison v Judd (unreported, 10 October 1995, NSWCA) House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Queensland v J L Holdings Pty Ltd (1996-1997) 189 CLR 146 Graywinter Properties Pty Ltd v Gas & Fuel Corporation Superannuation Fund (1996) 70 FCR 452 Equuscorp Pty Ltd v Perpetual Trustees WA Ltd (1997) 24 ACSR 194 Equuscorp Pty Ltd v Perpetual Trustees WA Ltd (1997) 80 FCR 296 Jesseron Holdings Pty Ltd v Middle East Trading Consultants Pty Ltd (No 2) (1994) 122 ALR 717 CASES CITED : Macleay Nominees Pty Ltd v Belle Property East Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 743 Scanhill Pty Ltd v Century 21 Australasia Pty Ltd (1993) 47 FCR 451 Eyota Pty Ltd v Hanave Pty Ltd (1994) 12 ACSR 785 Chadwick Industries (South Coast) Pty Ltd v Condensing Vaporisers Pty Ltd (1994) 13 ACSR 37 Rohalo Pharmaceutical Pty Ltd v R P Scherer SpA (1994) 15 ACSR 347 David Grant & Co Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1995) 184 CLR 265 Energy Equity Corporation Ltd v Sinedie Pty Ltd (2001) 166 FLR 179 Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher (1987-1988) 164 CLR 387 Asia Pacific Glass v Sindea Trading Co [2003] NSWSC 334 Endeavour Film Management Pty Ltd - 1st Appellant PARTIES : Ian Chandler - 2nd Appellant Fox Studios Australia Pty Ltd - Respondent FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 1961/03 COUNSEL : I Chandler - 2nd Appellant in Person SF Hughes - Respondent SOLICITORS : BD Andrews & Co Solicitors - Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate