NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v CHEN [2004] NSWCCA 369 HEARING DATE(S) : 7 October 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 25 October 2004
JUDGMENT OF : McClellan AJA at 1; Studdert J at 39; James J at 40 DECISION : Appeal granted but appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS : APPEAL - aggravated break enter and steal - offence committed in company - whether sentencing judge erred in failing to take into account or have proper regard to time spent by the applicant in custody - whether sentencing judge failed to properly apply the totality principle - whether sentencing judge erred by failing to backdate the sentence - whether sentence manifestly excessive in the circumstances Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59 R v Chi Luong (unreported, NSWCCA, 9 March 1994) R v Deeble (unreported, NSWCCA, 19 September 1991) R v Frascella [2001] NSWCCA 137) CASES CITED : R v John David (unreported, NSWCCA, 20 April 1995) R v Jones (unreported, NSWCCA, 3 August 1992) R v Niass (unreported, NSWCCA, 16 November 1988) R v Simpson (2001) 53 NSWLR 704 at 75-79 R v Todd [1982] 2 NSWLR 517 PARTIES : Pei Lin Chen (Appl) The Crown (Resp) FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 2004/1850; (60299/04) COUNSEL : T S Corish (Appl) J Girdhan (Crown/Resp) SOLICITORS : Legal Aid Commission (Appl) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown/Resp)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate