NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Thurston [2004] NSWCCA 98 HEARING DATE(S) : 23/09/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 1 July 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Hidden J at 1; Barr J at 17; Newman AJ at 34 DECISION : Appeal against conviction dismissed (by majority).; Leave to appeal against sentence granted, appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW: Appeal against conviction and sentence - murder - adequacy of directions on joint criminal enterprise in respect of felony murder - application of the proviso - no question of principle on sentence. LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Driscoll v The Queen (1977) 137 CLR 517 Festa v The Queen (2001) 208 CLR 593 Miraz v The Queen (1955) 93 CLR 493 R v Bell [1999] NSWCCA 423 R v Ceissman (2001) 119 ACrimR 535 R v Cohen & Bateman (1909) 2 Cr App R 197 R v Fernando (1992) 76 ACrimR 58 CASES CITED : R v Gallagher (1998) 2 VR 671 R v Munro (1981) 4 ACrimR 67 R v Storey (1978) 140 CLR 364 R v Sharah (1992) 30 NSWLR 292 at 297-8. R v Weldon [2002] NSWCCA 308 R v Whittaker (1993) 68 A Crim R 476 at 484 Re Johnston's Appeal (1960) 9 FLR Wilde v The Queen (1988) 164 CLR 365 PARTIES : Regina Edward George Thurston FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60209/03 COUNSEL : P Ingram - Crown S Odgers SC - Appellant SOLICITORS : CK Smith - Crown B Sandland - Appellant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate