NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 57 NSWLR 310
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Roads & Traffic Authority of NSW v Conolly & Anor [2003] NSWSC 327 revised - 12/06/2003 HEARING DATE(S) : 24 March 2003, 27 March 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 23 April 2003 JURISDICTION: Common Law JUDGMENT OF : Adams J at 1 DECISION : Summons dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS : Subpoena duces tecum - unknown whether documents may assist party issuing - whether fishing - legitimate forensic purpose - accuracy of speed camera - whether documents concerning complaints producible - meaning of "on the cards" LEGISLATION CITED : s100AJ of the Justices Act 1902 Alister & Ors v The Queen [1983-1984] 154 CLR 404 Commissioner of Railways v Small (1938) 38 SR 564 Fitzgerald v Magistrates' Court of Victoria and Others [2000] VSC 348; 34 MVR 448 Gaffee v Johnson (1997) 90 A Crim R 157 CASES CITED : Glare & Ors v Bolster & Ors (1993) 18 MVR 53 New South Wales Commissioner of Police v Tuxford & Ors [2002] NSWCA 139 Principal Registrar of the Supreme Court v Ali Tastan (1994) 75 A Crim R 498 R v Saleam (1989) 16 NSWLR 14 Regina v N (unreported, NSWCCA, 21 July 1998 Roads & Traffic Authority of New South Wales (Plaintiff) PARTIES : v Alan Robert Conolly (First Defendant) Barry Miller (Informant) (Second Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 10517/03 COUNSEL : Mr Terrence Lynch (Plaintiff) Mr David Carroll (Defendant) SOLICITORS : Hunt & Hunt (Plaintiff) A R Conolly & Co (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate