NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Cogent Nominees Pty Ltd v Anthony [2004] NSWSC 1094 HEARING DATE(S) : 9 November 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 9 November 2004 JURISDICTION: Equity JUDGMENT OF : Hamilton J DECISION : Orders made consequent on settlement.
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE [113] - Supreme Court procedure - Practice under Supreme Court Rules - Judgments and orders - Self executing orders - Incidents of. Douglas v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd [1983] 3 NSWLR 126 CASES CITED : FAI General Insurance Co Ltd v Southern Cross Exploration Ltd (1988) 62 ALJR 216 Morgan v 45 Flers Avenue Pty Ltd (1987) 11 NSWLR 573 T A Field Pty Ltd v Frigmobile of Australia Pty Ltd [1978] 2 NSWLR 488 Cogent Nominees Pty Limited (P1) Cogent Investment Operations Pty Limited (P2) Cogent Securities Pty Limited (P3) Upul Anthony (D1) Futures Telecom Pty Limited (D2) Andrew Robert Terrence Boyd (D3) PARTIES : Victor Wilden-Constantin (D4) Advantage Telecommunications (Australia) Pty Ltd (D5) Hastings Singh (D6) Pathmasiri Nimal Kannangara (D7) La-Bourse Pty Ltd (D8) Neil Matthew Danson (D9) Dr Angelo Anthony (D10) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4735/02 I E Davidson (Ps) & mentioning (9D) G Thomas (2, 3 & 5Ds) COUNSEL : In person (6D) No appearance (1, 4, 8 & 10Ds) Submitting appearance (7D) Corrs Chambers Westgarth (Ps) Gibsons Lawyers (1 & 8Ds) Watsons (2, 3 & 5Ds) Cutler Hughes & Harris (4D) SOLICITORS : Feeney Lawyers (6D) Carroll & O'Dea (7D) No appearance (9D) Deacons (10D)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate