NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Regina v Ronen & Ors [2004] NSWSC 1295 HEARING DATE(S) : JUDGMENT DATE : 12 August 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Whealy J at 1 DECISION : The oral evidence will go before the jury not in a limited way but as evidence of the truth of the admissions made. Again, the scope and weight of those admissions will be a matter for the jury.
CATCHWORDS : Evidence - Crown's entitlement to lead evidence as to the course of the uinvestigation - - Scope of evidence - accused offered opportunity to participate in interview - - Right to silence - - s 87(1)(b) admkissions within scope of authority LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act Telecommunications (Interception) Act 179 CASES CITED : R v Reeves (1992) 29 NSWLR 109 Petty v The Queen (1991) 173 CLR 95 Regina v Ida Ronen PARTIES : Regina v Nitzan Ronen Regina v Izhar Ronen FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 70222/03; 70032/03; 70223/03 Mr T. Game SC; Ms S. McNaughton - Crown COUNSEL : Mr R. Richter QC; Mr N. Rosenbaum - Accused Ida Ronen Mr I. Hall QC; Mr E. Power - Accused Nitzan Ronen Mr R. Van de Wiel QC; Mr P. Jones - Accused Izhar Ronen SOLICITORS : Ms P. Musgrave - Cth DPP Watsons Solicitors - Accused
LOWER COURT Local Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION CRIMINAL LIST
WHEALY J
THURSDAY 12 August 2004
70222/03 - REGINA v Ida RONEN 70032/03 - REGINA v Nitzan RONEN 70223/03 - REGINA v Izhar RONEN
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate