NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Dodds v Premier Sports Australia Pty Ltd & Ors [2003] NSWSC 948 HEARING DATE(S) : 25 to 29 August, and 1 September, 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 24 October 2003
JURISDICTION: Equity Division Commercial List JUDGMENT OF : Palmer J DECISION : Plaintiff's claims for relief dismissed; declarations as sought by Defendants.
CATCHWORDS : CONTRACT - EMPLOYMENT - Plaintiff engaged by United States corporation to manage pay television business - employment contract provided a very substantial termination benefit - control of the business changed and the United States corporation ultimately had no further interest in the business - Plaintiff continued to work in business - no express or oral employment contract with subsequent employer - new employer had no knowledge of the termination benefit in former contract with United States corporation - whether former contract, including termination benefit provision, "assigned" to new employer - whether new contract was made with new employer which by implication incorporated all the terms of the former contract, including the termination benefit. HELD: Plaintiff's contract with subsequent employer did not include the termination benefit provided in former contract of employment. LEGISLATION CITED : Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW) - s.106 Corporations Law - s.232, s.237 - BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Hastings Shire Council (1977) 180 CLR 266 - Byrne & Frew v Australian Airlines Ltd (1995) 185 CLR 410 CASES CITED : - Hawkins v Clayton (1988) 164 CLR 539 - Premier Sports Australia Pty Ltd v Dodds [2001] NSWSC 707 - Carter & Harland "Contract Law in Australia" (4th Ed., para 909) David James Maitland Dodds - Plaintiff (50060/03); Defendant (50059/03) PARTIES : Premier Sports Australia Pty Ltd - First Defendant (50060/03); First Plaintiff (50059/03) Sports Investments Australia Pty Ltd - Second Defendant (50060/03); Second Plaintiff (50059/03) News Limited - Third Defendant (50060/03); Third Plaintiff (50059/03) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50060/03; 50059/03 COUNSEL : N.A. Cotman SC, P.R. Glissan - Plaintiff (50060/03); Defendant (50059/03) M.A. Pembroke SC, N.J. Beaumont - Defendants (50060/03); Plaintiffs (50059/03) SOLICITORS : Anthony J. Restuccia - Plaintiff (50060/03); Defendant (50059/03) Allens Arthur Robinson - Defendants (50060/03); Plaintiffs (50059/03)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate