NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Quasar Constructions v A J Stockman Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 117 HEARING DATE(S) : 02/03/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 4 March 2004
JURISDICTION: Equity Division Technology and Construction List JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J DECISION : Application for judicial review dismissed
CATCHWORDS : ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - judicial review of determination of adjudicator under Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act - whether jurisdictional error of law - requirement that adjudicator have regard to contract price in assessing value of work - whether adjudicator exercised judgment LEGISLATION CITED : Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999, ss.8, 9, 10, 22 Abacus Funds Management Ltd v Davenport [2003] NSWSC 1027 Brodyn Pty Ltd v Davenport [2003] NSWSC 1019 CASES CITED : Quasar Constructions NSW Pty Ltd v Demtech Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 116 R v Toohey; Ex parte Meneling Station Pty Ltd (1982) 158 CLR 327 Transgrid v Siemens Ltd [2004] NSWSC 87 Transgrid v Walter Construction Group Ltd [2004] NSWSC 21 Quasar Constructions NSW Pty Ltd - Plaintiff PARTIES : A J Stockman Pty Ltd - First Defendant Tony Veghelyi - Second Defendant The Australian Solutions Centre - Third Defendant FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 55012/04 COUNSEL : Mr D D Feller SC - Plaintiff Mr K J Tapsell, Solicitor - First Defendant SOLICITORS : James R Knowles Lawyers Pty Limited - Plaintiff Watkins Tapsell - First Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate