NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Pasade Holdings v Sydney City Council [2003] NSWSC 913 HEARING DATE(S) : 27 June 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 10 October 2003 JURISDICTION: Equity Division JUDGMENT OF : Bryson J at 1 DECISION : Order that the plaintiff pay the second, third and fourth defendants' costs assessed at $3036.58.
CATCHWORDS : COSTS - assessment of costs of submitting defendants in proceedings under s.88K Conveyancing Act 1919 for grant of easement - submitting defendants had easements over site of proposed new easement but there was no conflict or adverse implication - submitting defendants properly joined as their possible compensation had to be considered under subs.88K(2)(b) - appropriate for plaintiff's application to be carefully considered for possible adverse implications on value of defendants' City building - submitting defendants claimed $24,783.58 - Court allowed 7 hours solicitor's attendances, no fees for counsel - costs assessed at $3,036.58. s.88K Conveyancing Act 1919 LEGISLATION CITED : s.88K(2)(b) Conveyancing Act 1919 s.88K(5) Conveyancing Act 1919 117 York Street Pty Ltd v. Proprietors of Strata Plan No. 16123 (1998) 43 NSWLR 504 at 515-516 CASES CITED : Kent Street Pty Ltd v. Council of the City of Sydney (2001) 10 BPR 1 8757 Pasade Holdings v. Sydney City Council [2003] NSWSC 515 Padade Holdings v. Sydney City Council [2003] NSWSC 584 Pasade Holdings Pty Ltd (Plaintiff)
v
Council of the City of Sydney (First Defendant)
Graham William Byrne (Second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate