NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Pierson v Holden & Ors t/as Garland Hawthorn Brahe [2004] NSWSC 46 HEARING DATE(S) : 3 December 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 20 February 2004 JURISDICTION: Common Law JUDGMENT OF : Master Harrison DECISION : (1) The appeal is dismissed; (2) The decision of the review panel dated 22 June 2001 is affirmed; (3) The amended sumons filed 1 July 2003 is dismissed; (4) The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs as agreed or assessed.
CATCHWORDS : Appeal: costs review panel's decision LEGISLATION CITED : Legal Profession Act 1987 - s 208 Legal Profession Regulations 2002 - s 61 Allen v Kerr & Anor (1995) Aust Torts Reports 81-354 CASES CITED : Azzopardi v Tsman UEB Industries Ltd (1985) 4 NSWLR 139 Cachia v Isaacs & Ors (1985) 3 NSWLR 366 Charles Pierson (Plaintiff)
PARTIES : Michael Geoffrey Anthony Holden, Ian John Benecke, Stephen Edward Martin and Brendan John Miller t/as Garland Hawthorn Brahe (Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 12268/2001 COUNSEL : Mr D R Pritchard (Defendant) Mr P Beazley of Beazley Singleton (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Mr I Kirkman of Garland Hawthorn Brahe (Defendant)
LOWER COURT Costs Review Panel JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT N/A FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Panel Members P R Brewster & J S Cockle JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate