NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : GRIFFITH & ORS v AUSTRALIAN BROADCASTING CORPORATION & ANOR [2003] NSWSC 484 HEARING DATE(S) : 27-30 MAY 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 27 May 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Levine J DECISION : Imputation 25(c) is capable of being carried and capable of being defamatory.
CATCHWORDS : Imputation - capacity - "brainwashed" - form - difference in substance JEREMY NORMAN GRIFFITH (First Plaintiff)
FOUNDATION FOR HUMANITY'S ADULTHOOD (ACN 003 930 023) (Second Plaintiff)
TIMOTHY JOHN MACARTNEY-SNAPE (Third Plaintiff)
SAMUEL CHARLES BELFIELD (Fourth Plaintiff) JOHN CAMERON BIGGS (Fifth Plaintiff)
SUSAN JANE ARMSTRONG PARTIES : (Seventh Plaintiff)
BRONWYN GLENIS FITZGERALD (Eighth Plaintiff)
HEULWEN MARY JONES (Ninth Plaintiff)
STACY ANNE RODGER (Tenth Plaintiff)
v
AUSTRALIAN BROADCASTING CORPORATION (First Defendant)
DAVID MILLIKAN (Second defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20300 OF 2003 K Smark (Plaintiffs) COUNSEL : B Walker SC / R Glasson (Defendants) Schweizer & Co (Plaintiffs) SOLICITORS : Baker & McKenzie (Defendants)
- 1 - DLJT 2 Ex tempore: revised [2003] NSWSC 484 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION DEFAMATION LIST
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate